From the Mercury News:
Henderson maintained he isn't holding a grudge against the A's that they weren't able to bring him back one last time at the end of his career despite several personal appeals to make it happen. After all, he still thinks it can happen.
"It was a dream, it was where I started, so it was where I wanted to finish up," he said. "I thought the fans deserved it for me to come back to finish my career and say goodbye to them. But it didn't happen because of certain terms and it wasn't the right time because (the A's) were rebuilding. I didn't get too upset about it; I tried to understand what was going on, deal with it and move on.
"My career of being a baseball player in Oakland was fantastic, I wouldn't give it back for anything else. I had a wonderful time, the fans of Oakland were the best fans who were ever behind me and even when I was on another team, they always cheered. So I knew that my home was with Oakland and I knew that the fans were behind me, but we just didn't get the opportunity to say goodbye for the last time. But you never know, there may be another time when we get a chance to say goodbye."
This was a hot topic on AN a while back: Did the A's make a mistake by not allowing Rickey to come back and play one last weekend in the green and gold? Would it have appeared to be more of a publicity stunt, or would it have been seen as the final chapter of a brilliant Oakland career?
Had Rickey re-signed with the A's, even for a brief time, it would have pushed back this great moment. Obviously, that was a sacrifice Rickey was willing to make; he seemed dead serious about a return visit. You would have to believe that ticket sales for his final games would have filled the Coliseum with fans, both old and new, and there was a legitimate chance that Rickey could have outperformed at least part of the A's lineup at the time. He certainly could have rivaled the 2008 offense, even at 49. And it would have been fun; a chance to relive history; a chance for new A's fans to get a glimpse of a past that has defined Oakland baseball from 1979 on; a chance to see if a superstar can defy his age, even for a single at-bat.
It obviously wasn't a risk the A's were willing to take, for whatever reason, and since there is little chance that Rickey would be allowed an encore now, Oakland fans will have to be satisfied with Rickey as a Hall of Famer as he addresses the crowd, not Rickey as an Oakland baseball player. The accolade will be the same, the honor still great, the return of Rickey as magical as ever, but for all of us as Rickey fans--and for Rickey himself--this is truly the end of an era. No longer the Peter Pan of baseball, Rickey must now set aside his dream of returning to the Oakland field, and take his rightful place in A's history; however reluctantly.
But maybe, just maybe, when Rickey looks up to see his number adorning a Coliseum wall, he will realize that he single-handedly carved his name into the lore of Oakland history, and to all of baseball as well. Rickey doesn't need an encore game to prove that he belongs to Oakland; or that he was one of the best baseball players to ever play the game. Rickey doesn't owe Oakland fans a thing; he gave it to us out on the field. Congratulations, Rickey; if you never pick up a pair of cleats again, it will have been enough. And my greatest wish is that it's enough for you.
0 recs | 47 comments
SOB!
lynnzgal - January 13, 2009
Are you calling Rickey names, or are you crying? ;-)
baseballgirl - January 14, 2009
Lol!
You know.
lynnzgal - January 14, 2009
And thank you.
So many of us feel the same.
lynnzgal - January 14, 2009
Anytime...love Rickey :-)
baseballgirl - January 14, 2009
if the a's fall out of contention this year
i hope they bring hall of famer rickey back for a week, like when 59 year old satchel paige pitched 3 innings for the a’s in 1965.
how awesome would it be if rickey stole second base on rickey HoF bobblehead day.
xbhaskarx - January 14, 2009
Late Show With David Letterman
Rickey and Rice did the top 10 list on Letterman tonight.
Ovale Fan - January 14, 2009
Letterman's writers
must be trying to kiss up to AN so that we won’t be too hard on Giambi.
Englishmajor - January 14, 2009
Of course it would have been a publicity stunt
But we should have done it anyway.
I thought 2005 was the year to do it. We had Charles Thomas, Hiram Bocachica, Matt Watson, and Jermaine Clark back and forth between Oakland and Sacramento that year. Surely Rickey could have found a place on that team, as a 4th/5th outfielder and pinch-runner.
There were indications that Billy did explore the idea in 2007, but Rickey balked when he realized it would have been a one-day deal. (Link.) It’s not clear exactly what was suggested, but I wouldn’t be so quick to blame the organization for not making it happen. It sounds like Rickey may have had unrealistic expectations about what his role on the roster would be. (Though personally, I’d have been happy to keep Rickey on the 25-man roster for the rest of the season, albeit not as a regular starter.)
iglew - January 14, 2009
I remember that
and had hoped something could be worked out, where both parties could feel comfortable, but not make a mockery of the situation. In short, even though the A’s knew it ti be a publicity stunt, it could have been disguised as something else (to satisfy RIckey). The whole issue, of course, was that Rickey wanted to leave the game on his terms, and his alone, so I am not certain that he would have even met half-way on this. Which, of course, was part if his appeal to begin with. Not to blame the organization at all, but there are few times that call for special circumstances, and I believe that was one of those times.
67MARQUEZ - January 14, 2009
What would happen if they brought him back after the HOF brings him in?
MobiusKlein - January 14, 2009
The HOF would have to update the display to add a couple more stolen bases to the total. ;)
LoneStranger - January 14, 2009
Agreed
The team should have tried to meet him halfway, which would mean more than just a one-day ceremony. But like you said, I’m not sure halfway would have been enough for Rickey. For all we know, the team did try but couldn’t come to an agreement. In fact, I believe they probably did. Billy tries a lot of things that don’t pan out, and he generally doesn’t tell about them afterward.
iglew - January 14, 2009
Rickey wanted, and still wants to be given a legitimate chance
Not a token one PA thing. Meaning if he plays badly, you cut his ass. But, if he plays well, he continues to play.
rfloh - January 14, 2009
Voted yes, but can we PLEASE make that video not Auto-Play?
Thanks.
mikev - January 14, 2009
So that's a no on the Auto Play?
Because it’s crazy annoying to have the video start EVERY TIME I click on the home page.
mikev - January 14, 2009
It's not on AutoPlay
Have to manually start it to see it.
baseballgirl - January 14, 2009
It autoplays every time I refresh the page.
mikev - January 14, 2009
Doesnt autoplay here...
I have to click play for it to go.
OaktownPower - January 14, 2009
And mine doesn't play even when I press "play."
So I guess mikev and I balance each other out?
oblique - January 14, 2009
Haha...awesome :-)
I’ll take it down in a little bit, and just leave the story up.
baseballgirl - January 14, 2009
Thank you
mikev - January 14, 2009
Done...
baseballgirl - January 14, 2009
YOU SO TOTALLY ROCK.
mikev - January 14, 2009
mikev - January 14, 2009
It's good.
lynnzgal - January 14, 2009
reminds me of my 14th birthday
67MARQUEZ - January 14, 2009
You wore a pink Tutu?
mikev - January 14, 2009
In Russia,
pink Tutu wears you!
Leopold Bloom - January 14, 2009
silly
that was my 17th birthday
67MARQUEZ - January 14, 2009
I agree it would have been more of a publicity stunt...
… but so what? Some people and players transcend everything else, and Rickey is one of them. Even if it would have been as a September call-up would have been great, and not affected any rebuilding or anything.
UncleLeo - January 14, 2009
bay bridge series
let him take the last time out in LF during the bay bridge series. Nobody cares about that game any way so give him his due.
Arcman - January 14, 2009
Nice, I like that.
67MARQUEZ - January 14, 2009
Agree
Rickey comes to spring training, shares his experience and wisdom, gets a few ABs here and there, then plays in the Oakland game of the Bay Bridge series.
Instead of 12,000 disinterested fans, the stadium is full, Rickey wears the green and gold in Oakland and everyone goes home happy.
cvdoug - January 14, 2009
he'll be able to get all the same glory when the A's retire #24
as far as Rickey memories, there are so many…but one that comes to mind isn’t a singular moment, but just something he did well. I’m not sure I’ve seen a left fielder who could play balls hit down the line and hold runners to singles better than Rickey could. He’d nail a few guys at second on this play, but more often he’s force dudes to skid out rounding first and scurry back.
scatterbrian - January 14, 2009
Wouldn't it be nice
if the A’s retired Dave Stewart’s number as well. Two Oakland natives and two truly great A’s.
jdub69 - January 14, 2009
$
Hopefully, someone can expound on a cost-estimate of paying a major leaguer for a month(their union is pretty strong)? around $50k? in the old coliseum, but the ticket sales may not offset that…..but Bay-bridge innings, with our outfield settled, sounds awesome.
greenpaddedgloves - January 14, 2009
But the roster size is fixed,
so if Rickey is on the team for a month, then whatever league-minimum bench-sitter gets bumped for that month is back down to minor-league salary, right?
Anyway, it’s not just actual ticket sales. It’s the whole marketing push for TV audience, boost the team reputation/awareness, memorabilia sales, etc.
iglew - January 14, 2009
I don't mean this to answer GPG's question
The question remains. If someone wants to do a money analysis, I’d be happy to hear it.
iglew - January 14, 2009
Me too. I'm curious.
baseballgirl - January 14, 2009
This is my quick and dirty money analysis.
Rickey + Hall of Fame Induction + Oakland A’s = $$$
VORP is too nerdy - January 14, 2009
Only three $?
LoneStranger - January 14, 2009
I don't live in Oakland
But I’d buy a season ticket package (albeit a small one) if the A’s invited Rickey to spring training.
mrrickyg - January 14, 2009
I voted yes, in hindsight
But at the time I was against it because the guy would NEVER retire if we kept letting him get ABs.
ChadGod - January 14, 2009
Thanks to AN super search,
Here’s a fanpost about it in 2007. The poll shows we were 89% in favor at the time.
I also found this one comment where I called for it in 2006. Can’t find anything from me in 2005, though.
iglew - January 14, 2009
would his HOF eligability been pushed back...
…if he signed a one day contract so he could have officially retired as an “A”?
Don’t know if that is customary in MLB, but is known to ocassionally happen in the NFL (Jerry Rice, Emmitt Smith, etc…)
swerv - January 14, 2009
It would have
… but probably not now. It would be fun to sign him and let him play the month of September after he’s already been inducted. I bet he could still hit .200 and steal a few bases.
dylan - January 15, 2009
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Athletics Nation to post a comment.