I'm not talking about Chavez, Buck, and Kotsay (nor, for that matter, any other members of the Glass Men A-gerie).
Nor am I talking about the Dan Jenkins novel or the Burt Reynolds vehicle it was turned into.
No, I'm talking about non-tenders.
As in, offseason moves by MLB teams when they decline to tender offers to players on their 40-man rosters, thereby making them free agents.
Tim Dierkes at MLB Trade Rumors had an interesting post the other day, wherein he worked up a list of players likely to be non-tendered by their current teams in December.
A non-tender is basically the offseason equivalent of a DFA -- a team cutting ties with a player it feels has no role on the roster (often because of a disparity between salary and health/productivity) -- with the advantage over a DFA in that the team simply cuts all ties with the player and retains no financial responsibility.
Dierkes's list (and take it for what it's worth -- I haven't researched the players' contract status, and I'm taking him at his word and his analyses are usually in the ballpark, so to speak) has some intriguing names. Given the A's projected lineup holes, health concerns, and payroll limitations -- and the mediocre quality of the '07-08 FA class -- some of these fellas might be worth pursuing on the cheap this offseason:
None of these semi-tough dudes would necessarily solve any of the A's major problems heading into '08 (and those problems are legion). But they could be turned into useful role players, if they're made available and the price is right.
Personally, I don't see any "normal" FAs this offseason being worth the expense, unless Beane is going to think big and sign either Bonds or A-Rod. This crew of potential castoffs could offer a lot more ROI than the supposed "front-line" free agents behind Bonds and A-Rod.
0 recs | 18 comments
breaking news A's sign free agent
Adam Melhuse is back. Signed to help the A's the last month of the season.
Arcman - September 1, 2007
another comment from last night's game
(possibly related)
I've been to many mlb games in my life, yet last night was the first time I've noticed a catcher in the bullpen before the game practicing blocking balls in the dirt (Suzuki).
OaklandSi - September 1, 2007
Blocking Balls
Geren said (on the Bob Geren Show) that he has Suzuki perform this training drill before every game because so many balls were getting away from him, and a couple of the A's pitchers throw so many balls in the dirt.
Fungo - September 1, 2007
I know, I heard the interview
and such a drill wouldn't hurt quite a few catchers that I've seen over the years.
I just found it interesting to actually see the drill last night...and it wasn't for a short time, either.
OaklandSi - September 1, 2007
nice ...
the bench has been getting cold.
devo - September 1, 2007
bench coach?
jubjub - September 1, 2007
Scott Podsednik is not Aaron Rowand ...
He has had exactly one season in his career in which he posted better than an OPS+ of 86.
Aaron Rowand has been better than that every season since he became a regular. While I'd agree that Rowand is a good bet to drop off, he's posted these kind of numbers twice in the last four years, so it's not unprecedented.
Rowand is also a GG-caliber center fielder. Scott Podsednik is a left fielder ...
I'm not saying that Rowand won't be overpaid ... though I do think he'll likely be the second best deal (Behind A-Rod) in these years big dollar free agent class.
devo - September 1, 2007
yeah
I was going to post this exact comment (minus the OPS+, I'd probably just cite OPS), no need.Cutthemullet - September 1, 2007
Geren's Idea
A's catchers spend 20 minutes before each game blocking balls. Story was posted last week in CCTimes
lostin1965 - September 1, 2007
I've been to many, many games
but Suzuki is the first A's catcher (or any catcher, for that matter) who I saw going through that drill -- for a good long time, and right before the game.
In that interview (which I read, also heard him on the radio) Geren may have made it sound like standard practice. But that's not what it looked like out there.
OaklandSi - September 1, 2007
What the hell happened to Jorge Cantu?
Wasn't he supposed to be a star prospect?
PaulThomas - September 1, 2007
can't take a pitch
even in his big 2005 season (69 xbhs), he walked 19 times for an obp of .311. He walked a few more times last season, but his batting average and isoP both went down.
jubjub - September 1, 2007
So, basically a younger Shea Hillenbrand
Oh well.
PaulThomas - September 1, 2007
also can't field
not that I care a whole lot about that...maybe not 9 Hattebergs, but 9 Custs will be fine. But I don't see why the Devil Rays gave up on him...today's SS Josh Wilson has 3 errors in the game in progess against NYY, heh (if they still had him, Cantu would play 2B, Harris to SS).Cutthemullet - September 1, 2007
I would take Ensberg for a cheap short term deal
But noone else on that list represents any sort of upgrade.
Podsednik is bad at everything related to baseball except running fast. He would be a useful pinch runner, except that he's bad at stealing bases. He also requires a defensive replacement in the OF in late innings, and he can't hit.
MrIncognito - September 1, 2007
he'll probably be a Mariner
and he'll have a breakout season. Bavasi's so bad, though, that you can't really say that it would make him look like a genius...it would just make him look average.
Cutthemullet - September 1, 2007
Podsednik = Do Not Want
Surely, we haven't forgotten this:
doctorK - September 1, 2007
you have not failed...
to supply us with links here...the best writer at directing traffic away from the site, haha.
Cutthemullet - September 1, 2007
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Athletics Nation to post a comment.