SB Nation - Login for mobile commenting

Athletics Nation

The Dreaded Eighth Inning

Exhale, Ken Macha, no need to reach for the acid reflux medicine anymore.

A's manager Ken Macha had a quick and definitive answer when he was asked what he'll remember most about the 2004 season.

"The eighth inning," he said.

Not the eighth inning of any particular game, mind you. He was talking about the many, many eighth innings that led -- directly and indirectly -- to an A's loss.

It's truly what every A's fan dreaded about last season.  And what's beautiful is the fact that this year's Oakland Athletics are going to have a variety of options for those late innings that are proven successful.  

No more white knuckle endings...suddenly, A's fans can stop asking their doctors for blood pressure medicine.

Yes, there will likely be someone who doesn't work out in the pen, be it Juan Cruz or Kiko Calero or even Dotel, but the truth is that now the A's have depth in the organization and can reach down into the system to pluck someone like Huston Street to take the role.  Or even Jairo Garcia.

If the A's young starting pitching can hold up this year and go five or maybe six innings, the A's pen will actually win them some games.  Especially when you combine it with that much improved offense.

It's going to be a new dynamic for us A's fans, having the games decided early rather than late...but I'm feeling like I'm free from the Prevacid once and for all.

Free at last.

0 recs  |  21 comments

Comments

I just know
that Macha will still find a way to mess up the pen.
Really Unfair
I think it's really unfair that everyone blames Ken Macha for the bullpen's demise last year.

There were so many restrictions on who was available when, so many guys playing a bigger role than they were capable of, and, for much of the season, no reliable closer.

Bradford was overworked, Mecir was overworked, Rincon was asked to do more than he should, Duke became over exposed, and Rhodes just plain sucked.

What could Macha do? Call up Huston Street? Trade for help? Isn't that the GM's job?

Clearly, the bullpen was poorly constructed last season. Billy Beane realized that and went out and improved the pen for 2005. He obviously doesn't blame Macha. The talent simply wasn't there.

This year, Colero can pitch the 7th, Cruz can pitch the 8th, Bradford can face one or two righties, Rincon can face one or two lefties, and Dotel can close.

Does that mean Macha becomes a million times smarter than he was last season? No, because now he has the guys to do the job.

I just hope
that our bullpen is used wisely next season. I feel a lot better now that we have a more stable and improved bullpen who can hopefully pick of the slack any of the new starters may have. At least now I won't have to duck and hide when the eighth inning comes around and hope for the best, which will keep the anxiety level down. :)
My nails will thank me..
for the less frequent biting. I don't even remember what it's like to not worry when I see relief pitchers take the mound.
And I
Will thank my stomach for not turning as much.
The First Thing I thought of...
"Free at last. Free at last. Thank godallmighty, free at last."
While it's certainly true...
...that Macha didn't have the guys you'd want to have out there, it's also true that he never seemed to identify roles, he never seemed to figure out who was hot and who wasn't, and he was slow to react to problems. He could never stick guys in their roles and leave them there, even when they were successful.

A repeat performance with more talented, albeit younger, arms this year will be the thing that gets him fired, I think.

It wasn't Macha's fault
I don't think he had the horses.  Rincon shouldn't be used in any meaningful game.  My friend who's a Cleveland fan warned me about him, and he turned out to be right.  He's the Jeff George of pitchers, decent stats, but just can't win a big one for ya, and never good when it's on the line.

This year it's going to be the starters we will dread.  We might be calling for the 'pen in the 4th inning...

Pick your poison.  I think the team is always better when responsibility for winning is spread out over more players than 3.  Last year, we tried to have the Big 3 win everything, and when they don't you don't have much else to turn to.

This year will test my theory.  I think it's an upgrade, as does Beane.  But there will be a lot of painful starts by the young core pitchers.  That's just 2005.  There might also be brilliance.

Poor Rincon
Outside of a couple bad performances in key games down the stretch, he did an outstanding job on relief last year, I thought.  I still like him for an inning or two.
Rincon is fine
provided he is used correctly. He is a classic LOOGY, and when used that way last year he was effective.
I like BP's description...
of Rincon.  Jesse Orosco Mark II
Forgive my ignorance
but what is a LOOGY, anyway?
Lefty One Out GuY - a left handed reliever
Hey!
That's a baseball comment!
Mark your calendars!
I do occasionally make them...
;-)
I would hate to think
That my career accomplishments could be summarized by an abbreviation that sounds like a word for coughed-up phlegm.
looks and sounds ugly
but it's good to have one
It's good to have phlegm?
if it gets a pesky left handed
batter out in a crucial situation -- yes!
While I've got more confidence
in this year's pen, part of me thinks games this season will be high-anxiety like always.

The A's have, for years, played in lots of close games. Will that change without the B3? Who knows?

But I can easily see our starters going 6 innings, giving up 4 runs, the pen giving up another 1, and the team scoring 4-6 runs per game most of the time. That means more nailbiters.

Guess we'll wait and see.

In any case, it's good to have more confidence in the pen.

You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Athletics Nation to post a comment.